• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Randal Rauser

Home of progressively evangelical, generously orthodox, rigorously analytic, revolutionary Christian thinking (that's what I'm aiming for anyway)

  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
    • Articles (single)
    • Articles (in series)
  • Audio/Video
    • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
    • Video Interviews and Lectures
    • Powerpoint Slides
  • Blog
    • Current Posts
    • Blog Archives
  • Podcasts
    • The Tentative Apologist Podcast
    • Archived Podcasts
    • Reviews

Ray Comfort’s Fruity Banana Argument for God’s Existence

October 31, 2017 by Randal

The results are in on my survey on the strongest argument for God’s existence. And the cosmological argument has won! Since most folks these days are most familiar with Craig’s version of the Kalaam Argument, my guess is that most folks think Craig’s Kalaam Argument is the strongest argument for God’s existence. I’m sure Craig will be delighted when he receives these results by special courier later today.

In the interim, some readers did ask me what the “Banana Argument” is. The argument can be found in a famous clip where popular apologist Ray Comfort describes his analysis of the banana as the “atheist’s nightmare”.

So why is a banana the atheist’s nightmare? Because it is easy to peel, nutritious, and it curves toward the human mouth.

This is, of course, nothing more than a bald instance of selection bias. If the banana is the atheist’s nightmare, there are no shortage of nightmares for theists. Ever tried to peel a pomegranate?

And as for nutrition, several fruits — cherries, apples, peaches — contain cyanogenic glycosides in their seeds/pits which creates cyanide in the body when ingested. Eat enough apple seeds and you could theoretically die from cyanide poisoning. What kind of design is that?

As for shape, for every ergonomic banana there is an intimidating, spiky durian.

For those reasons, Comfort’s Banana Argument has become emblematic of asinine natural theology and just plain bad arguments for God’s existence.

Anyway, nothing beats the original. And so, without further ado, here is Comfort’s analysis with Growing Pains sidekick Mike Seaver Kirk Cameron:

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: apologetics, banana argument, natural theology, Ray Comfort

Footer

Against Malaria Foundation

Against Malaria Foundation

Support Kiva

Support Kiva

Search this website

Archives



Copyright © 2022 • Randal Rauser • A Steady Site