Randal Rauser
    • About Randal
    • Books
    • Articles
      • Articles (single)
      • Articles (in series)
    • Audio/Video
      • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
      • Video Interviews and Lectures
      • Powerpoint Slides
    • Blog
      • Current Posts
      • Blog Archives
    • Podcasts
      • The Tentative Apologist
      • 59 Second Apologist
    • Reviews
    Search the site...
    • Home
    • The Tentative Apologist
    • The chief end of Man in Reformed perspective

    The chief end of Man in Reformed perspective

    March 22, 2013 / Randal / The Tentative Apologist / 11 Comments

    I’m currently reading through a new book called God and Evil (InterVarsity, 2013) for review in the blog. However, a comment by Paul Copan in his essay on the origin of evil caused me to pause. He writes of what he calls “strong Calvinists” that they find themselves in tension with “the Westminster Catechism’s own assertion that the ‘chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever'” (117). Why? Copan observes:

    “They [the strong Calvinists] would have to insist that the chief end of only some men–the elect–is to enjoy God forever. The nonelect, alas, have no such opportunity afforded them. Their chief end is to glorify God by being punished forever–without any genuine possibility of repentance in this life.” (117)

    You see, on the “strong Calvinist” view (which, I confess, is not substantially different from Calvinism simpliciter so far as I can see) the reprobate are chosen as reprobate (either through a decree of reprobation or the withholding of a decree of election) for a particular end, that of serving as objects of God’s wrath eternally so that his justice and power might be manifested more fully to the elect (along with the mercy and love the elect already experience as objects of election).

    So I guess we would get something like this rewording:

    What is the chief end of man?

    The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy (or be tormented by) him forever.

    There is another option however: deny that the group that comprises the set of reprobate persons are human persons at all. Granted they are biological human persons but they would not metaphysically be human persons. And “man” would be referring to metaphysical identity. Thus, we might say that “man” constitutes the set of biological human persons that are elect while “anti-man” (or unman or whatever you like) constitutes the set of biological human persons that are reprobate. And so we have:

    What is the chief end of man?

    The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever.

    And what is the chief end of anti-man?

    The chief end of anti-man is to glorify God and be tormented by him forever.

    Share
    Calvinism, election, Paul Copan, reprobation

    Follow This Blog

    Randal’s Books at Amazon.com

    What’s So Confusing About Grace?


    Randal-Rauser_An Atheist and a Christian Walk into a BarAn Atheist and a Christian Walk into a Bar…

    Randal-Rauser_Is-the-Atheist-my-NeighborIs the Atheist My Neighbor?: Rethinking Christian Attitudes toward Atheism

    Randal-Rauser_What-on-earth-do-we-know-about-heavenWhat on Earth Do We Know About Heaven?: 20 Questions and Answers about Life after Death

    Randal-Rauser_The Swedish Atheist, the Scuba Diver and Other Apologetic Rabbit TrailsThe Swedish Atheist, the Scuba Diver and Other Apologetic Rabbit Trails

    Randal-Rauser_God or Godless?: One Atheist. One Christian. Twenty Controversial QuestionsGod or Godless?: One Atheist. One Christian. Twenty Controversial Questions.

    Randal-Rauser_You're Not As Crazy As I Think: Dialogue in a World of Loud Voices and Hardened OpinionsYou’re Not As Crazy As I Think: Dialogue in a World of Loud Voices and Hardened Opinions

    Randal-Rauser_Finding God in The ShackFinding God in The Shack

    Randal-Rauser_Faith Lacking Understanding: Theology 'Through a Glass, Darkly'Faith Lacking Understanding: Theology ‘Through a Glass, Darkly’

    Randal-Rauser_Christian Philosophy A-ZChristian Philosophy A-Z

    Randal-Rauser_Theology in Search of FoundationsTheology in Search of Foundations

    Recent Posts

    • Is Theistic Evolution a Contradiction in Terms? A response to J. Warner Wallace
    • Rethinking Origins: The Evolution of a Young Earth Creationist
    • Give a Little Bit: My Super-Duper Christian/Skeptic Anti-Malaria Fundraiser!
    • Everything Wrong with This Christian Worldview Chart
    • Should we be certain of our beliefs? Or should we doubt?

    Archives

    Browse Blog Archives by Title >>

    © Randal Rauser - a steady site