Let’s carry on with Jonathan Pearce (aka a Tippling Philosopher) and his review of God or Godless. Jonathan writes: “The basis of Randal’s argument is the ontological argument. In other words, he has rational, epistemic right to believe that a maximal God exists.” First off, I don’t have a single basis of argument. Second, the […]
Tippling philosopher
God or Godless and a tippling philosopher (Part 1)
Last week Jonathan Pearce, the “Tippling Philosopher” blogger, reviewed God or Godless here. I was unable to offer a response at the time since I was out of country. But better late than never. Jonathan appreciated the brevity and concision of the book as well as the eclectic range of topics. However, he thought the concluding statements, […]
