• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Randal Rauser

Home of progressively evangelical, generously orthodox, rigorously analytic, revolutionary Christian thinking (that's what I'm aiming for anyway)

  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
    • Articles (single)
    • Articles (in series)
  • Audio/Video
    • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
    • Video Interviews and Lectures
    • Powerpoint Slides
  • Blog
    • Current Posts
    • Blog Archives
  • Podcasts
    • The Tentative Apologist Podcast
    • Archived Podcasts
    • Reviews

testimony

Should Christians Believe Muhammad Rode on a Flying Horse?

April 5, 2022 by Randal

I often hear a version of this quip from atheists: “If you accept the Bible’s miracles, why don’t you accept that Muhammad rode a flying horse?” The assumption lying behind the question is this: if you accept one miracle claim, why don’t you accept them all? Sorry to burst your balloon, but that’s like asking “If […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: epistemology, miracle, testimony

Anecdotes vs. Testimony

January 13, 2021 by Randal

Testimony forms a big part of apologetic argument. It may be the testimony of a person who says their life was personally changed by Jesus because they were delivered from an addiction. Or it could be the testimony of a person who says they were supernaturally healed of an ailment following a prayer. Or it […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: anecdote, testimony

On Rejecting Expert Consensus: Don’t Blame Donald Trump

January 6, 2017 by Randal

As of this evening, Donald Trump continues to challenge the consensus of 17 security agencies that the Russians were behind the DNC hacking to the end of influencing the 2016 election. Why does Trump deny this? Here’s his latest tweet: Need it be said that this is a foolish tweet? Trump knows nothing about the […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: Donald Trump, knowledge, rationality, social epistemology, testimony

The rhetorical indulgences of some Christian testimonies

October 26, 2016 by Randal

The other day I was listening to a recording of a gentleman giving a personal testimony of his Christian conversion. Just prior to the conversion he observed, “According to the world I had it all: money, fame, drugs, and sex.” I’ve heard a thousand testimonies over the years that used similar language. But this time this […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: rhetoric, testimony

The Problem of Testimonial Underdetermination

February 22, 2014 by Randal

One of our commenters, Nate, is a professional philosopher. And his comments reflect the fact. In the comment thread of “Testimony, God, and, er, a glass of milk” he offered an extended quote which is worth highlighting on the main stage. Please note that I’ve changed Nate’s text to red, I’ve added boldface in a couple […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: epistemology, justification, knowledge, rationality, testimony

Testimony, God, and, er, a glass of milk

February 18, 2014 by Randal

In the discussion thread to “Is atheism a default position?” Emilie_dC asked the following question: “If someone shows me two glasses of milk, and tells me that they are identical except that glass A contains an additional substance that is undetectable, what should I believe? “Should I be agnostic on the matter of whether glass A […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: epistemology, God, justification, knowledge, rationality, testimony

RD Miksa on the evidentiary value of eye-witness testimony

December 29, 2013 by Randal

While I do most of the heavy lifting in this blog, occasionally I will have a guest poster. The following essay started off life as an email from RD Miksa in response to the threaded discussion following my articles “Craig Keener on Miracles” and “Miracles and the old ‘testimony is unreliable so we can ignore […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: epistemology, evidence, rationality, RD Miksa, testimony

The signs of ideologically driven atheism

May 7, 2013 by Randal

In my essay “Testimony as Properly Basic” I presented what is, among epistemologists, a relatively benign thesis. It is the claim that testimony can serve as a properly basic source of justification. It is not an ultima facie source of justification, but it is a defeasible, prima facie source. In short, a person’s testimony to p can […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: civility, dialogue, epistemology, testimony

Why knowledge must begin in faith rather than evidence

May 5, 2013 by Randal

In “Testimony as Properly Basic” I outlined a simple way that a person could be justified in believing that “Jesus rose from the dead”. Instead of appealing to doxastic processes that are accepted only by Christians (e.g. the Internal Instigation of the Holy Spirit) I based my account on a mundane source of knowledge and rational […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: epistemology, evidence, faith, justification, knowledge, properly basic, reason, testimony

Testimony as properly basic

May 3, 2013 by Randal

In my last post I provided a simple way that a person could come to believe “Jesus rose from the dead” in a way that is properly basic. I did so by appealing to a very familiar source of knowledge and rational belief: the testimony of others. Those who are familiar with Alvin Plantinga’s work on this […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: epistemology, foundationalism, justification, proper basicality, reason, testimony

David Haitel’s testimony

January 31, 2013 by Randal

The tradition of sharing one’s testimony, of telling what God has done in one’s life, is deeply rooted in the Protestant tradition. My own apologetic interest in testimonies is found in the presence of elements like documented healings and cases of synchronicity (or what are colloquially called “God moments” or “God winks; in my own published […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: David Haitel, healing, miracle, synchronicity, testimony

The problem of half-baked rebuttals

February 9, 2012 by Randal

In “Why should a Christian think the Bible is inspired? (Part 1)” I addressed the following two issues: “The question is minimally how a person can rationally believe a particular canon of books is divinely inspired. More robustly, it is how they can know a particular canon of books is divinely inspired.” I then proposed […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: analogy, argument. epistemology, testimony

Footer

Against Malaria Foundation

Against Malaria Foundation

Support Kiva

Support Kiva

Search this website

Archives



Copyright © 2023 • Randal Rauser • A Steady Site