Back in May while I was visiting the University of Notre Dame I recorded a couple videos for the Center for Philosophy of Religion. In this short (2 minute) video I discuss whether one can prove that God exists.
Walter wrote: “I know that Randal considers this argument to be a Ferrari, but I would classify it as a Yugo: the engine runs, the car moves, but it is still a piece of crap.” Walter knows of Yugos that are still running? Seriously? (A brief aside. First, Walter’s saucy “piece of crap” quip reminds me […]
I just returned from driving the Ontological Argument to the airport when I found the following comment from Jerry: Walter, and then TAM, posted a link to a counterargument to the ontological argument. I didn’t read it all, but I did notice the following: Plantinga writes: “Our verdict on these reformulated versions of St. Anselm’s […]