Today, I’ve gotten into discussions with folks on Twitter about whether Karl Popper’s principle of falsification should be invoked to […]
- Home
- Posts tagged "philosophy of science"
What’s wrong with the scientific study of morality? An interview with Paul Rezkalla
Paul Rezkalla has an MA in Philosophy and Ethics from the University of Birmingham and an MA in theology from […]
ethics, interview, metaethics, naturalism, Paul Rezkalla, philosophy of science, scientismIntelligent Design Explanations are not Science Stoppers
It’s a familiar charge for anybody well versed in the ID literature: ID explanations ought to be rejected because they […]
intelligent design, philosophy of science, science stopperScientism and Metaphysics-of-the-Gaps
In this article I am going to address the concept of “God-of-the-gaps”. Any person who spends any time reading in […]
God of the gaps, metaphysics, philosophy of science, science, scientismIs evolution the easiest theory to disprove? A Response to Denis Lamoureux
Yesterday I posted my review of the new Zondervan book Four Views on The Historical Adam. One of the book’s […]
Denis Lamoureux, falsification, philosophy of science, science, theory24. Travis Dumsday on evil and divine hiddenness
If there is any person in the modern age who has embodied saintliness, it was that pillar of faith, Mother […]
intelligent design, interview, philosophy, philosophy of science, science, Travis DumsdayIntelligent Design: A response to the A-Unicornist
Mike D (aka The A-Unicornist) wrote an article yesterday titled “Randal Rauser is an ID proponent“. Near the beginning of the […]
agent cause, intelligent design, philosophy of scienceIntelligent design: The ultimate science stopper?
The Atheist Missionary’s claim: “The problem with ID is not that it is propounded by the Discovery Institute but rather […]
design inference, intelligent design, philosophy of science, scienceIntelligent Design, explanation, and the laws of physics
The debate on intelligent design continues with the latest proposal coming from Mike who writes: Intelligent Design could only be […]
intelligent design, laws of physics, philosophy of science, scientific explanationIntelligent Design, Unknown Intelligence, and a Ouija Board
Joseph H. Axell posted a long rebuttal in the comment section of my article “Unintelligent arguments against intelligent design: A […]
design filter, intelligent design, ouija board, philosophy of science, William Dembski