• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Randal Rauser

Home of progressively evangelical, generously orthodox, rigorously analytic, revolutionary Christian thinking (that's what I'm aiming for anyway)

  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
    • Articles (single)
    • Articles (in series)
  • Audio/Video
    • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
    • Video Interviews and Lectures
    • Powerpoint Slides
  • Blog
    • Current Posts
    • Blog Archives
  • Podcasts
    • The Tentative Apologist Podcast
    • Archived Podcasts
    • Reviews

natural evil

Should Christians keep speaking of paradise lost?

April 10, 2014 by Randal

The other day I was discussing Matthew Halteman’s booklet Compassionate Eating as Care for Creation in one of my classes. (Published by HSUS, it is a helpful, concise resource exploring the ethics of eating from a Christian perspective. If you’re interested, you can download the PDF from HSUS by clicking here.) At one point Halteman […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: Eden, natural evil, protology, science, the fall

Living artwork over the plains of Texas

June 14, 2013 by Randal

If you haven’t seen this time-lapse video of a supercell storm over the Texas plains you should definitely check it out. And since I’d be remiss not to include a theological or philosophical angle, isn’t it interesting how many of the most beautiful entities (structures, processes, etc) in nature yield the greatest destruction?  

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: aesthetics, beauty, natural evil, supercell

God is responsible for the legally insane. Therefore, God exists

March 28, 2013 by Randal

Two years ago Richard Kachkar stole a snow plow and began driving it down the streets of suburban Toronto. In the process he struck and killed police sergeant Ryan Russell. On March 27, 2013 Kachkar was found not criminally responsible by reason of insanity. Philosophically the verdict is interesting. On the one hand, the evidence presented […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: God, insanity, mental illness, moral evil, natural evil, Richard Kachkar, theism, theodicy, Tim McLean

Can animal resurrection compensate for suffering endured?

November 2, 2012 by Randal

“Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground outside your Father’s care.” Matthew 10:29 This passage reflects the benevolent providence thesis according to which God is providentially superintending the lives of all creatures. But if this is the case, then why does the sparrow fall […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: animal suffering, natural evil, problem of evil, theodicy

Satan and the problem of evil: is the devil in the details?

November 1, 2012 by Randal

Let’s consider further the attempt to attribute natural evils to the operation of malevolent spiritual agencies. Kerk takes issue with the way I described the role of malevolent agencies in the natural world. He writes: I think you are distorting the way that the evil agency hypothesis purports to explain natural evil. One does not […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: demons, natural evil, Satan, theodicy, theology

Are demons responsible for natural evil?

October 31, 2012 by Randal

In the discussion following my critique of William Dembski’s theodicy Dima asked about Greg Boyd’s thesis that natural evil can be attributed to demonic agency. The relationship between natural evil and demonic agency was memorably proposed by Alvin Plantinga in God, Freedom, and Evil when he noted that Augustine attributed natural evil to demonic agency. Based on […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: Alvin Plantinga, alvinize, demons, Gregory Boyd, natural evil, theodicy

William Dembski on Natural Evil

October 30, 2012 by Randal

Over the last couple weeks we’ve been wrestling with aspects of the problem of natural evil. Today we’re going to consider a solution to the problem of natural evil as it relates to animals which is proposed by William Dembski in his book The End of Christianity. We can summarize the problem in two parts: suffering and […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: natural evil, theodicy, William Dembski

Does natural evil always require sentience?

October 24, 2012 by Randal

In an earlier discussion of natural evil I defined the concept as follows: Natural evil refers to any event or state of affairs which (i) directly or indirectly leads to the suffering and/or deprivation of sentient creatures, (ii) is unconnected to the acts of commission or ommission of any finite creature (iii) but which is […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: natural evil, theodicy

What is it like to be a bat bug? Two errors of anthropopathism

October 23, 2012 by Randal

This article takes up the discussion of natural evil from “Bat Bugs? Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn.” In 1974 philosopher Thomas Nagel published a paper in Philosophical Review titled “What is it like to be a bat?” which became a classic of modern philosophy of mind. In the paper Nagel argues that […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: anthropopathism, Charles Darwin, natural evil, Richard Dawkins, theodicy

Bat Bugs? Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn

October 12, 2012 by Randal

My discussion of tramautic insemination and the problem of natural evil elicited a range of responses. But I’d like to focus on the response from David Marshall. He writes: As for bugs and their sorrows, frankly, my dear, I couldn’t give a damn.  Sorry, but it’s not like they have feelings. Wow, that’s even stronger […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: bat bug, natural evil, theodicy, traumatic insemination

Traumatic Insemination and other Natural Evils

October 11, 2012 by Randal

A few weeks ago I had to take a road trip of several hours across the prairie to teach a course in another city. So I dropped off at the library and picked up a few books on CD. One of the chosen titles was Amy Stewart’s Wicked Bugs: The Louse That Conquered Napoleon’s Army & […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: bat bug, natural evil, problem of evil, theodicy

Why nobody really believes natural evil exists: Natural Evil Explained (Part 2)

July 26, 2012 by Randal

A definition in need of revision In the first installment of my discussion of natural evil I offered the following definition of the concept: Natural evil refers to any event or state of affairs which (i) directly or indirectly leads to the suffering and/or deprivation of sentient creatures, (ii) is unconnected to the acts of […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: atheism, God, natural evil, providence, theism, theodicy

Natural evil explained (Part 1)

July 24, 2012 by Randal

Whenever the topic of natural evil comes up there are always those who express befuddlement at the concept. Yesterday I gave the example of a mudslide burying a campsite of children. That kind of event would constitute a horrific natural evil. The claim was met with some skepticism. NW responded like this: I’m wandering into unfamiliar […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: God, natural evil, problem of evil, providence, theism, theodicy

Allowing is not commanding

June 25, 2012 by Randal

Over the last week I have heard on at least three different occasions claims made to the moral equivalency of God allowing x and God commanding x. The argument has been made by Christians to demonstrate that if I accept that God providentially allows evils like genocide and infant sacrifice, I should have no problem […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: Bible, moral evil, morality, natural evil, providence, theodicy

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Against Malaria Foundation

Against Malaria Foundation

Support Kiva

Support Kiva

Search this website

Archives



Copyright © 2023 • Randal Rauser • A Steady Site