• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Randal Rauser

Home of progressively evangelical, generously orthodox, rigorously analytic, revolutionary Christian thinking (that's what I'm aiming for anyway)

  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
    • Articles (single)
    • Articles (in series)
  • Audio/Video
    • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
    • Video Interviews and Lectures
    • Powerpoint Slides
  • Blog
    • Current Posts
    • Blog Archives
  • Podcasts
    • The Tentative Apologist Podcast
    • Archived Podcasts
    • Reviews

falsification

Should theological claims be judged by Popper’s Falsification Criterion?

April 1, 2020 by Randal

Today, I’ve gotten into discussions with folks on Twitter about whether Karl Popper’s principle of falsification should be invoked to judge the value/veracity/legitimacy of theological theories. Things got going with my tweet in response to Counter Apologist. (Follow up on Twitter to see our full back-and-forth exchange.) It's interesting how many atheists assume without question […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: epistemology, falsification, philosophy of science, theology

Should you be able to say when you wouldn’t be a Christian in order to be a Christian?

February 16, 2020 by Randal

This morning, I posted the following as a tweet: Atheists often challenge me by asking the conditions under which I would reject the Bible as God’s Word, or say that God isn’t perfectly good or conclude that Christianity isn’t true. The assumption is that if I don’t provide those conditions, the faith I now have […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: atheism, Christianity, epistemology, falsification, skepticism

Is Christianity falsifiable? Does it matter if it isn’t?

July 6, 2019 by Randal

There is this all-too-common assumption among skeptics of religion that Christianity must somehow be “falsifiable” in order to be a legitimate interpretive framework for reality. The quick (and tempting) response is to say that Christianity is falsifiable: if there is no resurrected Jesus then there is no Christianity. However, many nominal Christians have continued in the […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: apologetics, falsification, rationality, worldview

Are theological theories falsifiable?

July 19, 2018 by Randal

There is a popular, but altogether mistaken idea that scientific theories differ from theological (or philosophical) ones in that the former can be falsified but the latter cannot. The popularity of this idea can perhaps be traced to the enduring influence of Antony Flew’s parable of the invisible gardener. But it’s flatly wrong. But the way […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: epistemology, falsification, science, theology

A Case Where I Spend WAY TOO MUCH Time Analyzing a Snide Atheist Meme

August 18, 2017 by Randal

Here is a tweet from the folks at “Atheist Republic”. Call it a meme if you want. (Might as well since the word “meme” seems to apply to most anything that gets retweeted.) So here’s the meme: pic.twitter.com/AduwjnloUq — Atheist Republic (@AtheistRepublic) August 16, 2017 I’m not sure what definition of “bullshit” the folks at […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: atheism, bullshit, evil, falsification, problem of evil, providence, rhetoric

Is evolution the easiest theory to disprove? A Response to Denis Lamoureux

May 16, 2014 by Randal

Yesterday I posted my review of the new Zondervan book Four Views on The Historical Adam. One of the book’s contributors, Denis Lamoureux, offered a response. Despite the fact that I stated Lamoureux presented the strongest case, he didn’t seem very happy with the review and listed several points that he thought I got wrong. […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: Denis Lamoureux, falsification, philosophy of science, science, theory

Beavers, Beaver-like Creatures, and Ad hoc hypotheses

July 10, 2012 by Randal

Ray Ingles asks: “Part of the point of the multiverse hypothesis is that explains the same things as a God’s supposed to, in an entirely different way. How do you pick between a God and a multiverse, anyway?” Ray, I’m really glad you asked. Let’s say that there are two boy scouts in the woods […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: atheism, cosmic fine-tuning, falsification, invisible gardener, multiverse, naturalism, theism

Why “defeating naturalism” is harder said than done

June 14, 2011 by Randal

The intrepid S1lverBullet posed a direct question to me: “what qualifies as a defeater to belief in Yawheh/Jesus/Holy Ghost? A logical impossibility? What, exactly?” Later he explained further what he was looking for: “I was asking what might qualify as a defeater? A defeater would be identified by what criteria? It seems that his [Randal’s] beliefs must […]

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: Christianity, epistemology, externalism, falsification, justification, naturalism, physicalism, rationality, Richard Carrier, warrant, worldview

Footer

Against Malaria Foundation

Against Malaria Foundation

Support Kiva

Support Kiva

Search this website

Archives



Copyright © 2023 • Randal Rauser • A Steady Site