• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Randal Rauser

Home of progressively evangelical, generously orthodox, rigorously analytic, revolutionary Christian thinking (that's what I'm aiming for anyway)

  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
    • Articles (single)
    • Articles (in series)
  • Audio/Video
    • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
    • Video Interviews and Lectures
    • Powerpoint Slides
  • Blog
    • Current Posts
    • Blog Archives
  • Podcasts
    • The Tentative Apologist Podcast
    • Archived Podcasts
    • Reviews

Turning the tables on the problem of evil

August 15, 2019 by Randal

Today, I had an extended back and forth with atheist video blogger (and actor) Scott Clifton. I wanted to post one bit of the exchange here because I address a very common type of question about the problem of evil.


Clifton: Can you name a good—any good—that can’t be brought about by an omnipotent being without millions of children being raped?

Rauser: That’s not how it works. Imagine that you start the first day of a five-year apprenticeship with a master of a trade. At noon, you call your wife and say “He had me sweeping the floor all morning. It’s a joke!” Your wife replies, “Maybe he has a reason for that.”

So you reply, “Can you name a reason that the master would have me sweep the floor on the first morning of a five-year apprenticeship?” The thing is, however, is that the onus isn’t on her to give a reason for the command. Rather, the onus is on you to argue that the master couldn’t have a reason. And frankly, three hours into a five-year apprenticeship, you’re not at all in a position to make that judgment. What makes you think you’re in a better position relative to the purposes of an omniscient being?

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: atheism, greater goods, problem of evil, Scott Clifton, theodicy

Footer

Against Malaria Foundation

Against Malaria Foundation

Support Kiva

Support Kiva

Search this website

Archives



Copyright © 2023 • Randal Rauser • A Steady Site