• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Randal Rauser

Home of progressively evangelical, generously orthodox, rigorously analytic, revolutionary Christian thinking (that's what I'm aiming for anyway)

  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
    • Articles (single)
    • Articles (in series)
  • Audio/Video
    • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
    • Video Interviews and Lectures
    • Powerpoint Slides
  • Blog
    • Current Posts
    • Blog Archives
  • Podcasts
    • The Tentative Apologist Podcast
    • Archived Podcasts
    • Reviews

On Spurious Attempts to Favor Naturalism over Theism

September 14, 2018 by Randal

In this article, I want to consider a spurious attempt to favor naturalism over theism. To be clear, I don’t take issue with the general maxim in the meme posted below. What I do dispute is the facile attempt to favor naturalism over theism based on the maxim:

In my rebuttal, I point out that if we attempt to apply that principle to favor naturalism over theism, then we ought likewise to apply it to favor solipsism over realism:

This rebuttal functions as a reductio ad absurdum. Just as it is absurd to conclude that solipsism is, ceteris paribus, to be preferred over realism, so it is absurd to suppose that naturalism is, ceteris paribus, to be preferred over theism.

Conversely, one could accept the conclusion that both solipsism and naturalism are, ceteris paribus, the preferred hypotheses. However, one could then point out that this is a weak concession because all sorts of other evidence can immediately overwhelm that preference: i.e. all else is most certainly not equal.

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: apologetics, epistemology, naturalism, Ockham's razor, solipsism

Footer

Against Malaria Foundation

Against Malaria Foundation

Support Kiva

Support Kiva

Search this website

Archives



Copyright © 2023 • Randal Rauser • A Steady Site