Randal Rauser
    • About Randal
    • Books
    • Articles
      • Articles (single)
      • Articles (in series)
    • Audio/Video
      • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
      • Video Interviews and Lectures
      • Powerpoint Slides
    • Blog
      • Current Posts
      • Blog Archives
    • Podcasts
      • The Tentative Apologist
      • 59 Second Apologist
    • Reviews
    Search the site...
    • Home
    • The Tentative Apologist
    • Godless of the Gaps

    Godless of the Gaps

    July 15, 2016 / Randal / The Tentative Apologist / 16 Comments

    In “God of the Gaps and Mind of the Gaps” I quoted Dan Barker writing the following in Godless:

    “Many of these [theistic] arguments are reduced to a ‘god of the gaps’ strategy. At most, the theists might prove the existence of a current gap in human knowledge, but this does not justify filling the gap with their god. After all, what happens when the gap closes someday? The gaps are actually what drive science–if we had all the answers there would be no more science.” (Godless, 104-5)

    In the discussion thread for the argument I posted a response to Jeff Lowder in which I explained my concerns with Barker’s comment more fully. (Admittedly, the original post was a bit cryptic, and intentionally so.)

    So here is my follow-up:

    First off, I’m going to replace Barker’s misbegotten reference to “their god” with the concept of a personal metaphysical explanation because very few arguments of this type appeal directly to a being like “The Trinity” or “Allah”. Rather, they point to a being that has certain properties consistent with what Christians (or Muslims) say about God.

    With that in mind, Barker writes: “At most, the theists might prove the existence of a current gap in human knowledge, but this does not justify filling the gap with their [personal metaphysical explanation]. After all, what happens when the gap closes someday?”

    As I read Barker here, he is saying that the theist is not rationally justified in appealing to a personal metaphysical explanation because that explanation might be shown to be false in the future.

    And that claim presumably depends on the principle that for any philosophical explanation, if that explanation could be disproved in the future then that explanation cannot presently be rationally justified.

    To be sure, I don’t know that Barker has a general principle in mind which under-girds his “God of the gaps” critique. But I am assuming he does to keep him from running afoul of the Golden Rule.

    The obvious problem for Dan Barker is that he is hoist by his own petard. Atheistic accounts of reality help themselves to their own share of philosophical explanations that could be disproved in the future from which it follows that atheistic accounts of reality are equally unjustified and liable to the similarly opprobrious “Godless of the gaps” charge.

    Since this analysis puts Barker in a very bad light, I’m open to other interpretations…

    Share
    atheism, Dan Barker, God of the gaps, theism

    Follow This Blog

    Randal’s Books at Amazon.com

    What’s So Confusing About Grace?


    Randal-Rauser_An Atheist and a Christian Walk into a BarAn Atheist and a Christian Walk into a Bar…

    Randal-Rauser_Is-the-Atheist-my-NeighborIs the Atheist My Neighbor?: Rethinking Christian Attitudes toward Atheism

    Randal-Rauser_What-on-earth-do-we-know-about-heavenWhat on Earth Do We Know About Heaven?: 20 Questions and Answers about Life after Death

    Randal-Rauser_The Swedish Atheist, the Scuba Diver and Other Apologetic Rabbit TrailsThe Swedish Atheist, the Scuba Diver and Other Apologetic Rabbit Trails

    Randal-Rauser_God or Godless?: One Atheist. One Christian. Twenty Controversial QuestionsGod or Godless?: One Atheist. One Christian. Twenty Controversial Questions.

    Randal-Rauser_You're Not As Crazy As I Think: Dialogue in a World of Loud Voices and Hardened OpinionsYou’re Not As Crazy As I Think: Dialogue in a World of Loud Voices and Hardened Opinions

    Randal-Rauser_Finding God in The ShackFinding God in The Shack

    Randal-Rauser_Faith Lacking Understanding: Theology 'Through a Glass, Darkly'Faith Lacking Understanding: Theology ‘Through a Glass, Darkly’

    Randal-Rauser_Christian Philosophy A-ZChristian Philosophy A-Z

    Randal-Rauser_Theology in Search of FoundationsTheology in Search of Foundations

    Recent Posts

    • Should Conservatives Protest LGBT Hallmark Movies?
    • How to Respond to Ken Ham in About a Minute
    • Christians and Skeptics Can Change the World Together! Won’t You Join Us?
    • Is Theistic Evolution a Contradiction in Terms? A response to J. Warner Wallace
    • Rethinking Origins: The Evolution of a Young Earth Creationist

    Archives

    Browse Blog Archives by Title >>

    © Randal Rauser - a steady site