GPS says the book is a “great idea”. In addition, “John did a very nice job” in choosing topics and had “clear and sharp arguments”. By contrast, GPS struggles to say something nice about me but finally comes up with the milquetoast compliment that I “score some points by not relying on a literal interpretation of Biblical [sic] text”. At least GPS concludes by observing that “I’m sure a believer would put Randal as winning”.
You can read the review here.
