• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Randal Rauser

Home of progressively evangelical, generously orthodox, rigorously analytic, revolutionary Christian thinking (that's what I'm aiming for anyway)

  • About
  • Books
  • Articles
    • Articles (single)
    • Articles (in series)
  • Audio/Video
    • Audio Interviews, Lectures, and Debates
    • Video Interviews and Lectures
    • Powerpoint Slides
  • Blog
    • Current Posts
    • Blog Archives
  • Podcasts
    • The Tentative Apologist Podcast
    • Archived Podcasts
    • Reviews

One final documented list of Alister McGrath’s Self-Plagiarism

October 3, 2012 by Randal

With my morning coffee steaming on the counter and nothing better to do, I went back to McGrath’s Christian Theology and began looking for more examples where he reuses material. I assure you that this is my last installment. In this list we will see that McGrath continues to borrow heavily between the books Christian Theology, Reformation Thought and Historical Theology, in some cases using the same sentences or even paragraphs in all three books. In one case it appears that he has used at least one sentence in four different publications. We will also see that portions of text in Christian Theology also appear in the following books by McGrath: Studies in Doctrine, Christianity’s Dangerous Idea, Science and Religion: A New Introduction, and in McGrath’s essay on “Darwinism” in The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. The extent to which McGrath freely reuses his own material across a broad range of sources is truly staggering.

So without further ado, here is the list:

One and 1/2 paragraphs  in the section on “The Augustinian Legacy,” p. 355, compare to McGrath, Studies in Doctrine (Zondervan, 1997), p. 379.

Christian Theology, pp. 359-61 compare to Reformation Thought (fourth ed.), pp. 120-122.

A paragraph in Christian Theology, p. 362, compare to Reformation Thought, p. 133 and Historical Theology, pp. 159-160.

Paragraph beginning “For Luther, as for the reformers in general,” Christian Theology, p. 364 compare to Historical Theology: An Introduction, p. 163 and Reformation Thought: An Introduction, p. 137 and The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Reformation, vol. 2, p. 368 (Google did not provide a view of this final source)

Paragraph beginning “Grace is a gift not a reward” in Christian Theology, p. 365 compare to Reformation Thought: An Introduction, p. 191.

The section titled “The Darwinian Controversy…” on Christian Theology, p. 371, compare to McGrath, “Darwinism,” in The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, p. 681, and McGrath, Christianity’s Dangerous Idea (Harper One, 2007), p. 379.

Christian Theology, pp. 371-73 compare to McGrath, Science and Religion: A New Introduction, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 38-41.

The section titled “Martin Luther” in Christian Theology, p. 381 compare to Historical Theology, p. 172 and Reformation Thought, pp. 147-148.

The section titled “The radical Reformation” in Christian Theology, po. 383-4 compare to Historical Theology, p. 173, and Reformation Thought, p. 149.

Filed Under: The Tentative Apologist Tagged With: Alister McGrath, plagiarism

Footer

Against Malaria Foundation

Against Malaria Foundation

Support Kiva

Support Kiva

Search this website

Archives



Copyright © 2022 • Randal Rauser • A Steady Site